This quote and part of the story shows that there is a right and wrong time to alert people of certain truths. In the case of Brom and Ichy, when they were trying to start their life anew at the orphanage was not the time to alert them of their mothers' suicide, there is a possibility that Ren was bieng a little bit selfish here. He might have wanted Brom and Ichy to stay with him instead of leaving, so he had to pull out all the stops in order to accomplish his goal. Later, Tom, who is the twins father, interrupts the fight. Tinti writes, "A flood of icy water splached over Ten's head and clogged his ears...Tom was leaning over them with a rain bucket, and he swung it now over his head and knocked Ren on the side of the face as Brom and Ichy crawled away, soaked and dripping. "Leave them be!" Tom shouted. "Just stay away from them!" (Tinti 280). A father obviously always takes the side of his children, and in this case it was no different. We as humans must not think of only ourselves, we have to consider other people as well.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Final Blog post OR
We learn in the last seciton of the book that Brom and Ichy are really the sons of Tom, and Ren is the nephew of Tom. This development is interesting because it gives a new meaning to all three characters, who before this, were pretty much alone in the world. But even with their newfound relations, there was still trouble between the twins and Ren. One day, Brom and Ichy were thinking of traveling back to St. Josephs in the hopes of bieng adopted. Ren, because he thought that it was his duty to tell them, told the twins that no one would adopt them because their mother killed herself. Tinti describes the fight and the aftermath as, "Brom threw himself forward with a cry, He hit Rens stomach and the two went falling back into the house, a jumble of legs and arms. The jar slipped and smashed on the floor. Ren landed hard, sprawled next to Mrs. Sand's money, and something broke loose inside him, and he began to fight with all his strength- kicking; punching with his good hand, elbowing with the other- then felt his ankles yanked from underneath, and Ichy was on top and pummeling him, and the boy was strong, much stronger then Ren ever thought he could be" (Tinti 280).
Thursday, March 12, 2009
The good thief post #5
Since I last posted, the threesome has grown a little bit, to include former companions of Ren's from the orphanage and a troubled youngster, Dolly. Brom and Itchy (who were the twins that escaped from the orphanage) found Ren after a long search. Dolly was also with them, he was the man who Benjamin dug out of the ground, the novel never says but I am pretty sure he was in some type of coma. The section of the book that I read really explores the morality of digging out peoples' graves, and this section right here displays the details of the process and what effect it had on Brom and Itchy. Tinti writes, "Sarah, wife of Samuel, had been buried in her wedding dress...Ren tried to focus on the dress and not her face, which was terrifying- her skin stiff and cold as wax, the hair like straw...Her lips were deep purple, slightly open, and pulled apart...'I want to go home' Itchy cried. In the end they rolled her onto her face, severed the back ties, and took the dress from behind, Ren cutting along the seams...Itchy becan to pray under his breath, and Brom soon joined him. Our father, who art in heaven. Ren turned away toward the neighboring grave and saw the naked body of an old man on the ground, his penis like a soft piece of rope, his eyes open and staring" (Tinti 218).
To commit an act such as this in general is terrible in itself, but for children to have to experience the exhuming of graves on a daily basis, just for the purpose of thievery, is atrocious. The lasting emotional scars that can come from something like this will affect these pre-adolecents for the rest of thier lives, and may even cause them to have problems of their own. Benjamin and Tom, the two adult theives who are behind this buisness, already have an obviously low sense of morality and dignity, but to manipulate young children to assist you in matters like this breaches the farthest point of morality. Ren was origionally claimed by Benjamin, and he thought at first that he was bieng put in the arms of a loving father who would show him a good life, but he ended up bieng chosen because of the sentimentality of his missing hand. This passage, and novel in general, shows how life is not fair at all and most of the time, circumstances are forced on you without you bieng able to control it.
To commit an act such as this in general is terrible in itself, but for children to have to experience the exhuming of graves on a daily basis, just for the purpose of thievery, is atrocious. The lasting emotional scars that can come from something like this will affect these pre-adolecents for the rest of thier lives, and may even cause them to have problems of their own. Benjamin and Tom, the two adult theives who are behind this buisness, already have an obviously low sense of morality and dignity, but to manipulate young children to assist you in matters like this breaches the farthest point of morality. Ren was origionally claimed by Benjamin, and he thought at first that he was bieng put in the arms of a loving father who would show him a good life, but he ended up bieng chosen because of the sentimentality of his missing hand. This passage, and novel in general, shows how life is not fair at all and most of the time, circumstances are forced on you without you bieng able to control it.
Friday, March 6, 2009
OR post #4
In the beginning of the section that I read, Ren and his companions are leaving the town of North Umbrage and were proceeding to the hospital to start a new collection of revenue. They had gotten a tip earlier in the book that a certain doctor was looking for newly deceased bodies to research, and would pay well for the job. It would not be an easy task, though, filled with all kinds of dangers. The three of them proceeded to go to the hospital, where Ren was supposed to be the connection between the two thieves and the greedy doctor. While inside, he got a little taste of this doctor's character, which was an interesting one to say the least. A row of portraits hung in one of the hallways leading to the operating room, and Tinti describes what Ren infers as, "The man in the portrait was touching his chin, posed in the middle of some illuminating thought. Ren tried to imagine what this thought could be. He guessed that it was scientific in nature, but the more Ren studied the portrait, the more he realized that the man didn't look intelligent at all. He looked hungry. He was probably thinking of sausages, and Ren was nearly decided on this when a scream came from down the hall" (Tinti 130). It is obvious why this man may want corpses to explore, this quote gives a hint as to how this doctor might be obsessed with human anatomy to the point that he does not care about the moral implications of his actions.
When Dr. Milton sees Ren's arm (or lack of one), he notices that the person who amputated it knew what they were doing because they blocked the arteries while they were cutting it off. He then proceeded to ask Ren if he could take a "sample" of scar tissue from his wound, which Ren reluctantly agreed to. After taking a thin slice of skin off of Ren's stump, Dr. Milton told him how scar tissue was different from normal skin because normal skin interlocks in fine, tiny, scales, while scar tissue is more rugged and lacks hair follicles and glands. Ren feigns interest and finally is asked to leave, but to come back every week at 10 so their meetings seem less suspicious. As he is about to leave the building, a nun who he met earlier sees him and approaches him. She engages in conversation with Ren, and asks him if he is a Christian. He replies yes, and she agrees to pray for him, while interlocking him in a warm embrace. Tinti describes Ren's feelings afterwords as, "The nun rested her palm on the top of his head. Her hand was warm and soft but also strong, and Ren could imagine all the good work it had done... Sister Agnes was standing over him, and he did not want to move until she tok her hand away" (Tinti 136). This quote exemplifies the strong need Ren still has for a loving, religious figure in his life even when he is accustomed to the company of thieves.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
OR Post #3
As Ren and his two caretakers move to a different town, Ren gets to experience many different kinds of swindling tricks that Ben and Tom use to steal money from people. Ren is actually one of the main parts for a certain trick that involves a fake medicine that can supposedly make a child behave. The three of them travel to an Ice Cream social on a Sunday, and Ren is asked to punch another kid in order to start a fight. This scuffle is played out in front of a huge crowd, and then Ben arrives and offers to sell Ren's "father", Tom, some child curing medicine. Ren takes it, and is immediately calm and lazy. Hannah Tinti describes the scene as, " 'All that boy needs is some tonic.' Benjamin appeared, slipping out of the crowd, swinging the wooden case, and smiling. 'And I just happen to have some with me today. Mother Jones's Elixir for Misbehaving Children.' Tom handed him a wrinkled dollar bill, and the tonic was passed over. Ren's lip was split and his ribs ached. 'Im not going to drink it.' 'If you don't, Ill tan your hide'" (Tinti 94-95). After seeing Ren so relaxed and "behaved", many parents rush to buy a bottle. Every bottle works, maybe because the "Elixir" is laced with opium. This passage shows how stupid the common person can be when looking for a fast and easy solution to their problems.
When moving into the next town, they encounter a dismal sight. Benjamin knows the place, and it used to be a bustling mining town until a collapse trapped ten miners, and none escaped. They knock at the door of the local inn, and it is answered by a woman who always seems to yell, but she invites them in and immediately gives Ren a warm bath, and provides dinner for the two older men. Ren had not had a good meal or cleaning for weeks, and so after dinner and a little bit of sleep, he ventured downstairs to the kitchen. A plate with what looked like a large slab of meat and a piece of pie was sitting by the fireplace, untouched. Ren could not hold his hunger in, so he immediately gobbled down the cake. As he was about to leave, something extraordinary happened, and Tinti writes, "A bit of soot began to sprinkle down from the chimney into the fireplace. Ren could hear a scraping noise. Something was caught inside the flue- a bird, or perhaps a squirrel. His heart beat quickly, and the scratching stopped, as if the creature inside had heard it" (Tinti 113-114). It turns out that this rumbling was a man, and from his hiding spot in the corner, Ren could see that it was a deformed, little man, body parts not quite proportionate to one another. The man ate up the meal, and quietly dissapeared into the chimney. It is little plot twists like this that keep you so into Tinti's book, because you are hooked in to the possibilities of what could happen and wonder how this ties in to the rest of the main plot.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Blog Post #2
Isolation is something that can have an immense psychological effect on someone, expecially at an early age. Ren has been brought up in an orphanage for all of his life, and he has basically no idea of what the world is like outside of its walls.The odd berry picking trips in the summer are the only exceptions, and even then he does not venture more than a few miles from his dismal home. When he is taken up for adoption by a mysterious man, they waste no time in starting off on their travels, because that man is a wanderer. After arriving in a port town and seeing the ocean, Tinti describes Ren's fascination as, "The sun reflected off the water, and Ren lifted his hand to shield his eyes. He had never seen the ocean before, and not it laid itself out before him, the waves rippling together in patterns of light, spreading out toward the horizon, a giant rolling creature of openness and space" (Tinti 55). It is obvious that Ren is overwhelmed with emotion, witnessing such an amazing thing that we all take for granted. The reader now feels sorry for Ren and the orphanage boys who will never get to experience this. Benjamin later takes him to a mysterious house, where we meet Tom, Benjamin's "partner in crime". Ren listens to a conversation they are having and is intimidated by the older men. We see Ren's powerlessness when Tinti writes, "'Do you actually believe this' Tom said at last. 'No,' Ren said, although he did. Tom turned the book over and ran his palm across it. 'Could be worth something.' 'I don't want to sell it.' 'That's not for you to decide'" (Tinti 58). The book of saints is Ren's most valued possession, and he is powerless to stop anyone from taking it. He has no sense of self-esteem because he has been cooped up in an orphanage all of his life.
As Ren ventures out in to the harsh, cruel, world, we see just how much power and influence he has, absolutely none. Although not much different in today's world, a 12 year old in the 19th century who came from a weak background does not know how to stand up for himself. You can learn in the front cover of the book that Benjamin will eventually train Ren as a thief, but when those two went to a bookshop to sell a possession of Ren's, something more interesting is revealed about his character. Benjamin barters with the bookseller and finds out that "The lives of the saints" is not worth much at all. But some money is better than no money, so he sells the book. Ren is outraged inside, wanting the book back but knowing that there is no possible way that he can get it back. In a deceiving act, Ren "accidentally" knocks over a huge bookshelf, and in the confusion, he is able to swipe a book off of the shelf. This act of stealing is surprising because he was raised in a Catholic orphanage, but at the same time is not because of our perception that all less fortunate young boys will turn to the dark side of life.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
The Good Thief: Post 1
This quarter, I decided to read "The Good Thief" by Hannah Tinti. People often think of orphanages as dirty, rejectful, terrible places. And they are. In the novel I am reading, the central characer, Ren, was placed on the doorstep of an orphanage at a very early age. This book is set in the 19th century in New England, the orphanage run by Catholic priests. Tinti describes the orphanage as a wine making place packed with boys between the ages of toddler and teenager. It is the prototype church run orphanage, with strict discipline and gruel for meals. When talking about the discipline, Tinti says, "The whipping stool had held Ren's weight and the weight of many other boys over the years. Ren remembered the first time he had taken his place across it. Now there were even more scratches in the wood. It seemed close to falling apart. 'Who hit you?' The first strike was always a shock. The boy tried not to move as it seared into his skin" (Tinti 21). It is a sad thing that the brothers of the orphanage had to result to punishment like this, but there was no other way that they could punish every boy in the orphanage. The boys who were brought here were essentially rejected by society, and when they are treated like this it starts a downward spiral of a low quality of life. These situations can lead to great desperateness, as shown when every boy is fighting over a newly adopted kid's wishing stone, when Tinti exclaims, "Ren tried to kick them off, biting and scratching, but he knew in his hear that he was going to lose, and he felt the stone slip out of his hand. 'I want to wish for an arrowhead', said Itchy. 'That's not good enough' said Brom. 'For candy, then'. 'For Father John to break his neck'. 'For toys!' Ren listened to his friends. He had never hated anyone more" (Tinti 17-18). This example shows how crazy boys got over one little stone, a stone they thought had the power to get them out of that horrible place, it shows how much someone will do to get out of bad circumstances.
Every so often, a stranger would come to the orphanage to look for a boy. This was a very big deal, for the brothers and the kids, because the load of kids would lighten and one lucky child would be given a new family. Ren doesn't have as good of a chance, though, because he is missing a hand. Tinti describes the choosing process as, "Underneath Saint Anthony's statue the younger boys fidgeted and pushed, the older ones cleared their throats nervously. Brother Joseph walked down the line and straightened their faces, bumping his large stomach into the children who had fallen out of place..."I want a boy," said the farmer. Old enough to help me work and young enough for my wife to feel she has a child. Do you think you could do that?" Father John came up behind them. "You don't want that one." The farmer stepped back. He looked confused, then angry. "Why not?" Father John pointed at Ren's arm. "Show him" (Tinti 8-9). This process was very disheartening for a ton of the kids, the ones who were passed over. When you live in an orphanage, this is your only hope of a great life, and to see your dreams crushed is a hard thing to bear. It is worse though, if you are like ren. Tinti describes his feelings well when she writes, "The farmer tried not to react, but Ren could see the disgust hidden in his face as he turned away and moved down the line. Ren watched as he lifted his new son into the wagon. "What happens to the ones no one takes?" "They are conscripted," said Father John, "into the army." "Not an easy life" "It's the will of God," said Father John. "We do not question his ways." "I do" (Tinti 9-10). Every forgotten child's only wish is to have someone who will really love them. If they are not chosen before adulthood, their fate is sealed to a life of service. When those random farmers are walking down the line, gazing at every hopeful face, they don't know how much of an impact it makes when they pass someone by.
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Final Outside Reading Post
In modern America there are only two major parties that rule the political world: Democrats and Republicans. There are only two sides to an issue, the Liberal side, or Conservative side. At times, one needs to cross over the partisan line so as not to appear totally unbipartisan (forgive my Bush like terminology there). During the budget formation of 1995, Clinton could either choose to collaborate with the Republicans, or cost them politically with his own plan. Mr. Stephanopoulos expresses the situation as, "The former chairman of the House Budget Committee knew how tough it would be to produce a balanced budget that protected our priorities, and he understood the pace of the negotiating process. We accepted that Clinton would eventually have to compromise with the Republicans, but now was too early. They were just starting to pay a political price for their unpopular cuts; why let them off the hook?" (343). The president could either choose to tighten the noose around the republicans necks, or let them go free and appear politically weak. Their were benefits to both situations, a fine line needed to be crossed or left alone. A lone central question remained, with only two possible choices. Clintons choices were, "The 1996 presidential campaign would turn on the budget showdown of 1995. But how? Would voters, as Morris believed, reward Clinton for cooperating with the Republicans and signing a version of their balanced budget and tax cuts into law? Or would they, as I believed, reward the president for vetoing the Republican budget and protecting core government programs against crippling cuts?" (344). This decision, or any major decision made in political office for that matter, would shape the reelection and possibly even future ones because of the magnitude of the choice. Countless hours were spent making that one decision, showing the gargantuan ripple effect one choice can have in the world of politics.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Outside Reading post 11 of 12
A pressing question that grips the sociality of our world today is, "Is it morally right to invade a country just to forcefully impose democracy at the cost of American lives?". A section in the book I am reading, All Too Human by George Stephanopoulos, talks about when Clinton had to make a decision weather to invade Haiti or not. Military dictators had taken over in the past few years, so the entire country was in disarray. Although the Haitian military wasn't exactly a formidable force, American lives could be lost in the process. In the end, Clinton chose to invade, based on many political variables. For example, Stephanopoulos writes, "But although the invasion was not politically motivated, and full of political risk, it could be a political plus. Clinton was constantly being called "spineless" and "wishy-washy" - Doonesbury was depicting him as a talking waffle" (308). The invasion overall was a big risk, but in politics, you have to risk big to win big. In politics, self-image is obviously immensely important. You have to watch what the general public is thinking of you, especially in the year before an election. Many people do not consider how smart a politician is or what his/her viewpoints are, sometimes people just vote for the person they like best. In the book, Paul Miller made a good point when he said, "People want to hear value and cost. But you have to hit them where they live. Tell them there are nine million Haitians off our shores- and they all want to be your neighbor" (309). Miller brings up a good point in that most people, though on the outside they seem to be sympathetic, are faced with unfamiliar people invading their territory they aren't acceptant. These two great political points lead Clinton to the decision to invade Haiti, rational or not. Because in politics, the only thing that matters is winning in a political sense.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Outside Reading post 10 of 12
The whitewater incident was one that caused the Clinton white house to be rattled around quite a bit. This incident, plus some other minor ones in general, caused tremendous stress and chaos in the job of the author of my book, George Stephanopoulos. Because of the crisis, there was craziness in the days of every staffer in the White House. People had to miss appointments, and fill in for other people nonstop, which caused confusion in the administration. This is illustrated when Stephanopoulos writes, "The crisis had scrambled everyone's schedules. White House public liaison Alexis Herman asked me to fill in for Ickes at a meeting with business lobbyist on health care, which made me late for a long-scheduled lunch with two reporters writing a political history of the deficit, during which Heather popped in with a request from the White House social Office. Could I do an emergency "grip and grin" over in the East Room?" (246). Mr. Stephanopoulos was constantly going from place to place, trying to fill the needs of a million people at once. Tremendous stress was building up inside him, but because of the multiple issues that needed to be handled, much work had to be done. His days continued like that, he illustrated this point by saying, "That was it- four encounters totaling about ten minutes over the course of of fourteen-hour period during which I had more than a hundred conversations" (247). In a political job, direct communication is immensely important to get everyone informed and assured of what was going on. Even if it takes all of your energy, it is vital for an administration to connect with many different people, just to keep the boat afloat. In the end, with a plethora of issues and people building up on your plate, you have to meet the challenge, or your ship will sink.
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Outside Reading posts 7, 8 &9 of 12
When you are elected president, you are given a great amount of power, but even a tiny mistake using that power can cause great repercussions throughout the world. At one point early in the Clinton presidency, 14 men were arrested in Kuwait for planning the assassination of former president Bush as he was to receive an award in Kuwait City. A meeting was held in the situation room where Clinton and his top guns, including the author and Colin Powell, assessed the situation. The group was contemplating weather to launch a missile strike or stand idly by, and Mr. Stephanopoulos described what his colleague Warren Christopher said as: "Warren Christopher, whose taciturn North Dakota nature appeared to restrain his loquacious Arkansas boss, offered a one-sentence conclusion: 'You'll be judged on whether you hit the target' " (160). This simple conclusion emanates the simplicity of the situation and how simple the mind of the general American person is. In the end, after everyone around the table agreed that the best idea was to shoot the missiles off, Mr. Stephanopoulos said: " 'I don't think there's a choice, Mr. President' " (161). Clinton ended up launching the missiles, some of which hit the target. The book did not say the number of casualties, but the cost of defending the prior president was present.
A major roadblock during the Clinton Presidency was always put in place when the President was forced to nominate someone from a now-vacant position. In March of 1993, a justice on the Supreme Court resigned, forcing Clinton to choose a replacement before June 15th, when he would have to announce his pick to the Senate. Mario Cuomo, the governor of New York at the time, was the President's top choice for the pick, but the nominee was unsure of his intentions, he did not know if he really wanted the job or not. "That morning, Cuomo was still ducking the president. Clinton had called him the day before, but Cuomo's secretary didn't put the call through, saying that the governor was in the middle of budget negotiations and couldn't be disturbed. Yeah. Cuomo didn't take the call because he couldn't decide what to do- again" (166). This shows that you have to address and act aggressive toward someone who is on the fence, or else you will be wasting your valuable time and energy fighting a lost cause with petty exchanges. Cuomo finally rejected the offer, but then his son Andrew made a push for him to be reconsidered in calling Mr. Stephanopoulos the day before the announcement. He said that he would try to convince his dad to reconsider and accept the president's offer. Mr. Stephanopoulos wanted badly for Cuomo to be on the court, so he took the message to the President. Eventually, Cuomo rejected the offer again and Clinton had to nominate his second choice. Mr. Stephanopoulos was deeply saddened and felt stupid for considering him a second time and Clinton said: " 'My wife, Hillary, gave me a book that says, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.'" (174). This great quote conveys that if you have already failed in an area once, don't stupidly do the same thing again.
The single most important bill of Clinton's presidency was about to be held for a vote in the house. It was his major economic plan, and the result would either boost or ruin his presidency. The outline of the plan was to increase taxes for the rich, and improve programs for the poor and middle class, to help the average American out and bolster the economy. Sometimes, every vote is so important that it is worth giving out endless promises to ensue them. A majority of 218 is needed to win a vote in the House of Representatives, and the Clinton camp predicted themselves about 30 votes short. They were madly trying to gain votes, and Mr. Stephanopoulos described the situation as: "Getting us to 218 would take a lot of hand-holding and hard dealing. The democratic leaders- Speaker Tom Foley, Majority leader Dick Gephardt, and Majority Whip David Bonior- did their part with Howard Paster up on the Hill. Bob Rubin, Lloyd Bentsen, and Mack McLarty called everyone they knew too. But Clinton would have to get the final few votes himself. In the end, this was his plan and his presidency. He was commander and crew" (176-177). The mass chaos that ensued trying to gain those votes was necessary to keep the presidency alive, which made watching the voting on C-SPAN immensely intense. "they turned in their green voting cards, and the Speaker's gavel cfame hammering down. The final vote was 218-216. Not a vote to spare. The president's study erupted in a riot of hugs that soon subdued into sober relief. Clinton wasn't ready to celebrate" (179). Being a part of a presidential staff is one of the most nerve-racking intense experiences on this planet when a vote is close. It is also crazy when votes are needed for your cause. But in the end, the sweet success of knowing you changed America for the better is more than an adequate award.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)